Millennium Twain on Plasma Waves and Propulsion
See: Millennium Twain
As to Heim, well, we all recognize gangland nonsense (90 percent) when we see it. but hey, that makes it as good as or better than any of the other institutional physics or propulsion press.
But Plasma WAVE, yes! as you, and most of the other young and dissident experimenters and theorists know — the plasma vortex wave wisdom (a helicoid) has been utilized by true physicists and engineers for a century. there is no such thing as gravity or gravitons, but there IS INDEED the universal experience of ULTRA ULTRA low frequency and COSMIC amplitude group-plasma waves. these simple and obvious group plasma helicoids with wavelengths from the AU scale to the LightYear? and kilo-LightYear and mega-LightYear scales — make up the NODES and Troughs in which planets, and star systems and galaxies sit, orbit, and reside! simplicity itself, which I am now applying to the X49 Electrajet plasma vortex engine/aeroshell design. as a planet, we ride in, are pushed AND pulled by the group EM wave and plasma envelope!
And yes, propulsion has always been the main focus of my studies and work. at Space Sciences we specialized in building satellites, so I only had the opportunity to STUDY propulsion (not engineer it), and invite the best in the world to lead lectures and workshops. I studied intensively under Edward Gomersall, Rudi Beichel, Gary C. Hudson, Philip Bono, Robert Salkeld, Dietrich E Koelle, Max Hunter, Henry Kolm, Bruce Roth, Robert Carroll and others. Philip Bono coached me well, and provided extensive references from his library. Edward Gomersall donated his whole library to me (along with his passport!) and an Air Force pilots 'Blue Book' reference for guiding their differing trajectories to Earth orbit!
It wasn't until my middle years, at Stanford and Pacific American Launch Systems, that I got to have hands-on with rocket engine and EML (coilgun) design, assembly and testing. Gary Hudson, of course was my closest and most influential friend and mentor in the business. he never excelled at physics, but his singular economic and logistical and engineering sense (for SSTO, Single State To Orbit) was the best that the late 20th century offered. with Gary, I got to work with James Grote, Eric Laursen, Bevin McKinney? (an early student of mine at Berkeley) and others on chemical rocket engine theory and design, fabrication and testing. the work was done in silicon valley, California ... and the testing conducted at our test sites adjacent to the Mojave airport. I also, on my own and with Bruce Roth, did some coilgun experimentation to get the feeling for that very VERY low cost launch technology.
Only after I left Hudson's team, and moved to New Zealand, did I finally utilize my physics credentials — to break the 'rocket equation' and do the REAL math to determine the methods by which the Air Force had had routine access to Earth orbit for half a century. (during the 80s and 90s I DID circulate the numbers for the ACTUAL fuel or energy costs to get to orbit, ref. Gordon Woodcock (Boeing) — only about 20 cents per pound delivered to orbit, about a hundred-thousand times less than the US government's fraudulent charges for orbital access.)
Although I had worked with Gary Hudsons RocketPlane? design team in the early 1990s, and the Roton team in the late 90s, it wasn't until I was on my own in New Zealand in 1999 that I began looking at the SSTO logistics, environment, trajectory, propulsion and topology --began looking at it with the same unprecedented scrutiny that I had applied to the whole of physics during the 1990s. that is I discarded ALL assumptions, and noted all that were patent political and economic frauds, and started from scratch. and also at that time I played around with hydrogen peroxide as a rocket fuel, and got the enthusiastic Kiwis and Maori involved in the hand's on and the publicity. no one will ever forget my 'cooking' the fifty-percent concentrate hydrogen peroxide, in an empty office down the hall from FireShips and the dentist, simmering it over a hotplate, with windows open, until it reached 80 percent concentration.
While my computer 3D CAD skills developed, applied to fuselage designs from 1999 to 2001, I looked first at simple air-refueled H2O2? BWB (blended wing body) spaceplane designs (non air-breathing) and then air-breathing hydrogen-fuel BWB scramjet spaceplane designs. it was then, spurred on by a telephone request from the Times of London, that I composed and circulated several versions of the SpacePlane? Equation — revealing forever for an international audience the simplicity of the fraud of spacelaunch costs and spaceplane design.
It is a RARE and exciting point in a space physicist's lifetime when he is able to break through the 'matrix' programming of the rocket equation and other cult icons — to on-your-own write the ACTUAL space equations — and to yourself become the teacher and mentor for a generation of students and colleagues. ref. the standard bilge required reference, "Rocket Propulsion Elements".
At this point I would like to note the wonderful influence of my teacher Robert Carroll on my studies and work in space propulsion. up until the early 1990s I was still regurgitating and living underthe delusion of the cult program, that an accelerating spaceship's mass increases continuously (without limit) over time — whereas in reality it's velocity increases continuously without limit! — and further that lightspeed was either a constant, Vc, or limited to the maximum of Vc. each of these silly promotions are promulgated in a fraudulent 'scientific' marketplace that never learned simple algebra, nor how NOT to divide by zeros. I remember asking the question point-blank, at the founding conference of the NPA (Natural Philosophy Alliance) in 1994, asking it of Carroll during his lecture. the point had gone completely past the other audience members, although they were amongst the best the world of physics had to offer. Carroll was warmed to note that at least one member of the audience understood not only the substance of what he was sharing, but the fundamental ramifications and applications of that truth.
It wasn't until then, early 1990s, when I had unlimited access to SLAC and Stanford's voluminous library systems — and the vast literature of a global community of institutional, alternative and dissident physics — that the ubiquity of subluminal and superluminal lightwave and plasma velocities (and hence starship speeds) became overwhelming and trivial. it was then that I showed the obvious, that 'Black Holes' do not exist, that rather the supermassive superstellar phenomena that populate the centers of galaxies and denser plasma-cosmos regions are TOROIDAL SUPERSTARS, with 'horizon' rotational velocities, and polar particle beam speeds, that exceed Vc (the AVERAGE velocity of light). [and, of course, it was 1994 when the hundreds of pages of my math and illustration and scribbling led to the discovery of the 3-frequency superluminal lissajous topology of the proton. a standing, self-reflected, or re-connected electromagnetic wave. just look at the Lissajous figures on your oscilloscope!
Though I have had many many teachers over the decades in the areas of propulsion and velocity, I still look to the day when I have even ONE colleague in the world who has (honestly, ethically) studied, reflected, and written on the superluminal electrodynamic (OBVIOUSLY dynamic, non-static) topology of the atomic nucleus. in other words, nucleon-group topological dynamics. (which ARE indeed electromagnetic, so-called 'weak' and 'strong' (QED and QCD) fields being transparent pure red-herring misdirection to take the cattle, clones, away from looking at the ACTUAL electromagnetic wave (picoscopic and femtoscopic variable wavelength, frequency AND velocity) helicoidal topologies of protons, neutrons and their assemblages.
I assume there are no 'Moo-Cows' amongst the group members reading this, and thus you will not take personally these observations of the differences between MINDED individuals and mindless consumer zombies. (the difference between a natural philosopher who has read hundreds of books and papers, and one who has read thousands or tens of thousands.)
Or one who is simply awake, honest, globally-minded, and clear.
It is not about sex or sugar, it is about sacred respect.
For all our sacred relations,
Oh yes, the only engineerning I have had time to do in the last few years is the construction of my first WeebleRohr?, Hilsch Rankine (Whistler) Tube! that, and the Schauberger implosion electric generator (next on my list) are the warmups for desktop scramjet hydrogen engine testing.